ACCA LW · Chapter 3 · Question 5 of 10
Mrs Olley booked into a hotel and paid at reception. A notice in her bedroom excluded the hotel's liability for lost property. Her furs were stolen through the hotel's negligence. Why was the hotel unable to rely on the notice in Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel?
Test yourself: pick an answer
Reveal answer & explanation
Correct answer: A) The notice was not incorporated because it was seen only after the contract had been made
Explanation
To be incorporated, an exclusion clause must be brought to the other party's attention before or at the time the contract is made. The contract was concluded at the reception desk, so a notice in the bedroom came too late. Signature is a separate method of incorporation (L'Estrange v Graucob), and nothing in the case depended on print size.
More Contract terms MCQs
- Q7In a business-to-business contract, a supplier includes a clause excluding liability for death or personal injury resulting from its…
- Q8An exclusion clause is ambiguous and could be read in two ways, one of which favours the party seeking to rely on it. Which rule of…
- Q9Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, when is a term in a consumer contract regarded as unfair?
- Q10A statement made during negotiations is classified as a representation rather than a term. Which factor would most strongly suggest that a…
- Q1What is the main legal consequence of breach of a condition, as opposed to breach of a warranty?
