CA Inter P5 · Chapter 11 · Question 7 of 13
CA Vikram signs the audit report of a company relying entirely on a working paper prepared by an article assistant on a material inventory balance, without any review. The inventory is later found to be grossly overstated. He is most likely to be held guilty under:
Test yourself: pick an answer
Reveal answer & explanation
Correct answer: C) Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule, for not exercising due diligence or being grossly negligent in the conduct of professional duties
Explanation
Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule covers a member who does not exercise due diligence or is grossly negligent in conducting professional duties. Signing a report on a material area without reviewing the assistant's work reflects lack of due diligence. Here CA Vikram signed the report himself, so Clause (12) on allowing others to sign does not apply.
More Ethics and Terms of Audit Engagements MCQs
- Q9Which of the following persons is disqualified from appointment as auditor of a company under section 141(3) of the Companies Act, 2013?
- Q10Rathi & Co., an audit firm, has completed two consecutive terms of five years each as auditor of a listed company. Under section 139(2) of…
- Q11The members of Dhara Polymers Ltd. wish to remove the statutory auditor before the expiry of the term. Under section 140(1) of the…
- Q12The board of Ekta Pharma Ltd. requests its statutory auditor, Sinha & Co., to also conduct its internal audit. Under section 144 of the…
- Q13The statutory auditor of Gaurav Industries Ltd., a non-government company, resigns mid-term. Under section 139(8) of the Companies Act…
