CA Inter P5 · Chapter 9 · Question 12 of 12
During the audit of a government department, the auditor finds that a purchase was sanctioned by an officer whose delegated financial powers were lower than the value of the purchase. This finding relates primarily to:
Test yourself: pick an answer
Reveal answer & explanation
Correct answer: C) Audit against sanction, since the expenditure was not sanctioned by the competent authority
Explanation
Audit against sanction verifies that every item of expenditure is sanctioned, either specially or generally, by an authority competent to do so. Here, the sanctioning officer lacked the delegated power, so the expenditure is irregular. There is no indication of personal benefit or budget excess in the facts.
More Special Features of Audit of Different Type of Entities MCQs
- Q2In the audit of a government department, the auditor examines whether expenditure incurred was not prima facie more than the occasion…
- Q3Performance audit in government organisations primarily examines:
- Q4Under section 139(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, the statutory auditor of a government company (other than its first auditor) is appointed…
- Q5The statutory auditor of Bharat Utilities Ltd., a government company, submits the audit report. Under section 143(6) of the Companies Act…
- Q6Which of the following is a typical feature of the audit of a local body such as a municipal corporation?
