ICAEW BL · Chapter 6 · Question 9 of 10
Halcyon Ltd revokes the authority of its purchasing agent, Fintan, but does not tell its regular suppliers. A week later Fintan places an order with one of them in Halcyon's name. Which statement is correct?
Test yourself: pick an answer
Reveal answer & explanation
Correct answer: D) Halcyon Ltd may be bound, because Fintan's apparent authority continues until the supplier has notice of the revocation
Explanation
Revocation ends the agent's actual authority as between principal and agent. Third parties who previously dealt with the agent may still rely on apparent authority until they are told of the termination. Halcyon should have notified its regular suppliers. Halcyon may then claim against Fintan for acting without authority.
More Agency MCQs
- Q1Monique tells her letting agent in writing: 'You may sign tenancy agreements on my behalf for my flat at a rent of at least £1,200 a…
- Q2For several years Tobias, the manager of a garden centre, has ordered stock from Greenleaf Supplies in the owner's name and the owner has…
- Q3Which of the following is NOT a requirement for a principal validly to ratify a contract made by an agent who had no authority?
- Q4Before Lumen Ltd is incorporated, its promoter Saul orders printing from Inkwell Ltd 'for and on behalf of Lumen Ltd'. The written order…
- Q5Rufus is engaged by Aldermoor Ltd to find a buyer for its surplus machinery. Without telling Aldermoor, Rufus accepts a 'finder's fee' of…
