The CA Hub

ICAP CAF-1 · Financial Accounting and Reporting

CAF-1 Autumn 2026 Past Paper: Topics, Marks and Analysis

Sat on 17 August 2026. 9 questions, 100 marks set, overall pass rate 35%. Use this page alongside the official paper.

Question paper

Open official PDF

Examiners' comments

Open official PDF

Suggested answers

ICAP student portal

Suggested answers and marking plans sit in ICAP's student area (CRN login required).

Questions in this paper

Our own one-line description of what each question tests. "Paper" jumps to the question's page in the official PDF; "Comments" to the examiners' notes on it.

QAreaWhat it testsMarksPass rateOfficialWalkthrough
Q1MCQsNine MCQs (10 marks): club subscription income, preference shares in the SOCE, produce after harvest, interest cover, impairment indicators, interim dividends, the IFRS Interpretations Committee, bearer assets and gearing effects.1057%Paper Comments Q1 walkthrough
Q2Borrowing costs (IAS 23)Borrowing costs on a production facility funded by a specific loan and two general loans, with a strike stoppage and a completion date before final finishing work.761%Paper Comments Q2 walkthrough
Q3Government grants (IAS 20)Three years of journal entries for a plant bought with a deferred-income grant: availability-for-use date, a later component that extends life, and partial repayment of the grant.877%Paper Comments Q3 walkthrough
Q4Conceptual and regulatory frameworkExplain how assets and liabilities are measured under each measurement basis in the Conceptual Framework.826%Paper Comments Q4 walkthrough
Q5Policies, estimates and errors (IAS 8)IAS 8 disclosure notes for a change in depreciation method on a building and a change of inventory cost formula with three years of values.826%Paper Comments Q5 walkthrough
Q6Ratio analysis and working capitalCash operating cycle from sales, mark-up and balances, then four short-term window-dressing steps that would flatter it at year-end.843%Paper Comments Q6 walkthrough
Q7Statement of cash flows (IAS 7)Statement of cash flows (indirect method) from two balance sheets and notes on PPE, capital work-in-progress, investment property, impairment, interest, tax and dividends.1659%Paper Comments Q7 walkthrough
Q8Preparing the SOFP and SOPL (IAS 1)SOPL and SOFP from a trial balance with a suspense account, inventory write-down, loan interest accrual and current portion, capitalised interest, an unrecorded drop-shipment sale and depreciation allocation.2012%Paper Comments Q8 walkthrough
Q9Property, plant and equipment (IAS 16)Notes on PPE and investment property: a revalued production facility with changing residual values, and a multi-unit building split between own use and letting under the fair value model.1545%Paper Comments Q9 walkthrough

Marks by area

All 100 marks set, by area. MCQ items count towards their own area.

Heavier and lighter than usual

Compared with the average across all 2 indexed sittings of CAF-1 (differences of 5 marks or more).

Heavier

  • Property, plant and equipment (IAS 16): 15 marks vs 8.5 average
  • Ratio analysis and working capital: 10 marks vs 5 average

Lighter

  • Intangible assets (IAS 38): 0 marks vs 7.5 average
  • Equity transactions and SOCE: 2 marks vs 9 average
  • Investment property (IAS 40): 0 marks vs 5 average

Against the syllabus weightings

SectionSyllabus weightAutumn 2026 marks
A. Preparation of statements of financial position and profit or loss30–40%31
B. Statements of changes in equity and cash flows (incl. IAS 8, ratios)30–40%36
C. Accounting for non-current assets25–35%33

Section totals use our classification of each question's area into the syllabus grid.

Pass rate by question

Published in the examiners' comments for this sitting.

What the examiners said

The main themes of the official examiners' comments, summarised in our own words. Read the full report for question-by-question detail.

  • The pass rate rose again, but the trial-balance statements question (Q8) was once more the weakest, at 12%.
  • Theory questions on measurement bases and on IAS 8 disclosures were often skipped or answered superficially; around half of candidates scored nothing on measurement bases.
  • Final figures without workings again limited partial credit; the examiners recommend a referenced, systematic approach to adjustments.

Read the official examiners' comments

Other CAF-1 sittings