ACCA LW · Chapter 5 · Question 4 of 11
An employer knew that one of its employees was blind in one eye but did not provide him with safety goggles. He was struck in his good eye and became totally blind. In Paris v Stepney Borough Council, which factor was decisive in finding the employer in breach?
Test yourself: pick an answer
Reveal answer & explanation
Correct answer: A) The seriousness of the potential harm to that particular employee
Explanation
Paris v Stepney shows that the more serious the consequences of an injury, the greater the precautions a reasonable person would take. Because the claimant risked total blindness, the employer should have provided goggles even if it would not have needed to do so for other workers. Cost of precautions is a separate factor illustrated by Latimer v AEC.
More The law of torts and professional negligence MCQs
- Q6Oil was negligently spilled into a harbour and later caught fire, damaging the claimant's wharf. Expert evidence showed that fire damage…
- Q7A claimant suffers a minor burn caused by the defendant's negligence. Because of a pre-existing condition, the burn triggers cancer and…
- Q8A claimant was injured partly through the defendant's negligence and partly through failing to wear a seat belt. Under the Law Reform…
- Q9In Hedley Byrne & Co v Heller & Partners, the House of Lords recognised that a duty of care could arise in respect of negligent…
- Q10An investor bought shares in a company relying on audited accounts that negligently overstated profits, and suffered a loss. Applying…
