The CA Hub

ACCA LW · Chapter 5 · Question 5 of 11

A patient attended hospital with severe vomiting and was sent home without examination by the doctor on duty. He died of arsenic poisoning that could not have been treated in time even if he had been examined. In Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital, why did the claim fail?

Test yourself: pick an answer

Reveal answer & explanation

Correct answer: D) The breach of duty was not the factual cause of the death under the 'but for' test

Explanation

Although the doctor breached his duty by failing to examine the patient, the patient would have died anyway. The 'but for' test asks whether the harm would have occurred but for the defendant's breach; here it would have, so causation was not established. The case is a standard illustration of factual causation.

All 11 questions in Chapter 5The law of torts and professional negligence MCQs with answers

More The law of torts and professional negligence MCQs

Sponsored slot availableRun a CA academy or hiring firm? Put your name in front of students preparing for this exam.Advertise →