ICAEW SE · Chapter 2 · Question 10 of 13
Which statement best explains why delaying action on climate change can damage economic sustainability?
Test yourself: pick an answer
Reveal answer & explanation
Correct answer: D) Delay tends to increase the eventual costs of adaptation and of a faster, more disruptive transition, and raises the risk of assets losing value before the end of their expected lives
Explanation
The longer action is delayed, the greater the physical damage that must be adapted to and the sharper the policy changes needed later, both of which raise costs. A sudden transition can leave carbon-intensive assets stranded, damaging investors and the wider economy. Climate change is not purely environmental, and avoiding investment now does not remove the costs; it defers and usually increases them.
More Pillars of sustainability MCQs
- Q12Some sustainability models present the three pillars as three overlapping circles of equal size, while others present them as nested…
- Q13A mining company has the legal permits it needs, but local communities strongly oppose its new mine and have organised blockades. Which…
- Q1What are the three pillars of sustainability?
- Q2John Elkington's 'triple bottom line' encourages organisations to report on which three areas?
- Q3Several fishing companies share access to the same sea. Each company increases its catch to maximise its own profits, and within a few…
