ACCA LW · Chapter 3 · Question 3 of 10
A court is asked to imply a term into a commercial contract on the basis of the facts. Which test did the court use in The Moorcock?
Test yourself: pick an answer
Reveal answer & explanation
Correct answer: A) Whether the term is necessary to give business efficacy to the contract
Explanation
The Moorcock established the business efficacy test: a term will be implied if it is necessary to make the contract work as the parties must have intended. The related officious bystander test (Shirlaw v Southern Foundries) asks whether the term is so obvious that it goes without saying. Courts will not imply terms merely because they would be reasonable or fair.
More Contract terms MCQs
- Q5Mrs Olley booked into a hotel and paid at reception. A notice in her bedroom excluded the hotel's liability for lost property. Her furs…
- Q6Lia signs a written contract to buy equipment without reading it. The contract contains an exclusion clause. There is no misrepresentation…
- Q7In a business-to-business contract, a supplier includes a clause excluding liability for death or personal injury resulting from its…
- Q8An exclusion clause is ambiguous and could be read in two ways, one of which favours the party seeking to rely on it. Which rule of…
- Q9Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, when is a term in a consumer contract regarded as unfair?
